黄冈师范学院2020考研成绩查询入口及查询方式

发布时间:2020-02-16


2020年黄冈师范学院硕士研究生招生初试成绩查询时间通知已经发布,成绩查询时间:221日。小伙伴们,速来了解一下吧!详见下文。

我校定于221日发布2020年研考成绩,成绩查询网址为https://yz.chsi.com.cn。考生若对成绩有疑问,可于222日至26日通过电子邮件向我校提出复查申请,申请邮箱:157335145@qq.com226号之后不再接受任何复查卷面分的申请。复查卷面分结果将通知考生,不影响考生志愿调剂和复试。复查办法见18日《湖北省教育考试院2020年全国硕士研究生招生考试成绩公布及复核办法》。

咨询电话:131********黄老师   159********王老师

邮箱:157335145@qq.com

考研成绩查询注意事项

(1)一般来说,各大考研院校均不再另行寄发书面成绩单,以打印的成绩单为准。

(2)成绩为-1表示缺考,-2表示违纪。

(3)对初试成绩有疑义的考生,可申请复查,具体时间、要求请随时关注网上通知。

(4)如要打印成绩单,请用A4纸横向打印。(打印时,请在文件”->“页面设置中设置页边距的上下左右值均为15毫米。若使用非IE浏览器,请自行调节成绩单上下页边距使其为一页。)

考研成绩复核时间

成绩的复核时间都是由目标院校进行通知的,所以在成绩公布之后,通常会紧随着公布成绩复核通知,好好查看复核时间。一般需在规定日期内提交申请,1—5天不等。

成绩复核查询方式

成绩复核查询方式有四种:电子邮件、电话查询、考生本人亲自去报考院校查询和考生委托他人去报考去院校查询。成绩复核告知方式有:电话通知或官网公布,由于各院校成绩复核方式不同,具体查询及告知方式请前往院校官网查看。

成绩复核准备材料

准考证、身份证、成绩核查表(院校官网下载)等。此外,部分院校会按科次收取一定复核费用,一般在10元/科。

复核流程

1、下载《2020年硕士生入学考试初试成绩复核申请表》,一般需要填写考生姓名、准考证号、身份证号、需查科目代码及名称、已知成绩、联系电话等。

2、按表格要求填写本人签字后递交,一般递交方式为网上提交申请、交至招生工作办公室、将申请表传真至学校规定处或签字扫描申请表后发电子邮件至规定邮箱。

3、研招办老师审阅申请表,证件合格,登记复核信息。

4、查阅待复核的试卷,主要是查询是否有漏评、加分错、登分错,不会重新对试卷进行评分。

5、登记复核结果,通知考生。

以上就是51题库考试学习网今天为大家分享的“黄冈师范学院2020考研成绩查询入口及查询方式【221日开通】”文章,希望2020考研考生在这段特殊时期不要松懈,在家积极准备考研复试工作!更多考研成绩查询相关内容尽在51题库考试学习网成绩查询频道~武汉加油!湖北加油!


下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

关于我国公民基本道德规范的说法正确的是(  )
A.公民基本道德规范的提出,体现了对道德建设规律的自觉反映和深刻把握
B.公民基本道德规范的提出,体现了历史传统与时代精神的有机结合
C.公民基本道德规范的提出,体现了道德要求而未涉及法律要求
D.公民基本道德规范的提出,体现了对社会主义道德体系内容的丰富和拓展

答案:A,B,D
解析:
本题考查对公民道德建设重点的把握.《纲要》把“守法”确定为公民基本道德规范的重要内容,就是体现了道德要求和法律要求的有机统一.

Text 2 It used to be so straightforward.A team of researchers working together in the laboratory would submit the results of their research to a journal.A journal editor would then remove the authors’names and affiliations from the paper and send it to their peers for review.Depending on the comments received,the editor would accept the paper for publication or decline it.Copyright rested with the journal publisher,and researchers seeking knowledge of the results would have to subscribe to the journal.No longer.The Internet–and pressure from funding agencies,who are questioning why commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it–is making access to scientific results a reality.The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD)has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this.The report,by John Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD,makes heavy reading for publishers who have,so far,made handsome profits.But it goes further than that.It signals a change in what has,until now,been a key element of scientific endeavor.The value of knowledge and the return on the public investment in research depends,in part,upon wide distribution and ready access.It is big business.In America,the core scientific publishing market is estimated at between$7 billion and$11 billion.The International Association of Scientific,Technical and Medical Publishers says that there are more than 2,000 publishers worldwide specializing in these subjects.They publish more than 1.2 million articles each year in some 16,000 journals.This is now changing.According to the OECD report,some 75%of scholarly journals are now online.Entirely new business models are emerging;three main ones were identified by the report’s authors.There is the so-called big deal,where institutional subscribers pay for access to a collection of online journal titles through site-licensing agreements.There is open-access publishing,typically supported by asking the author(or his employer)to pay for the paper to be published.Finally,there are open-access archives,where organizations such as universities or international laboratories support institutional repositories.Other models exist that are hybrids of these three,such as delayed open-access,where journals allow only subscribers to read a paper for the first six months,before making it freely available to everyone who wishes to see it.All this could change the traditional form of the peer-review process,at least for the publication of papers.26.In the first paragraph,the author discusses

A.the background information of journal editing.
B.the publication routine of laboratory reports.
C.the relations of authors with journal publishers.
D.the traditional process of journal publication.
答案:D
解析:
文章第一段主要介绍了一个具体的传统论文出版的流程,通常作为第一段的案例是作为铺垫以引出文章的主题,也是为了说明文章的中心,从后文我们可以看出文章谈到的是一个现代的出版模式,那么相对应,这里应该是谈到的传统的出版模式。由此可知D项为正确答案。A项错在editing一词上,第一段中并未涉及编辑期刊这一概念,而是在介绍传统的期刊出版,属于偷换概念故排除;B选项的“publication routine”,论述范围太窄,不能完全表达全文意思;同时,此段确实出现作者author与出版商publisher的关键词,

“实”的病机最根本的方面是

A.邪气亢盛
B.水液蓄积
C.气血瘀滞
D.正气旺盛
答案:A
解析:

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。