快讯:2020年杭州电子科技大学考研成绩查询时间出来了
发布时间:2020-02-08
关于2020年杭州电子科技大学考研成绩查询通知,很多小伙伴都还不知道,下面就跟着51题库考试学习网一起来了解一下吧!
当前,全国新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情防控工作形势依然严峻,为确保广大考生的身心健康和生命安全,同时有序推进我校研究生招生工作,现将各位考生关切的事项告知如下:
一、硕士研究生初试成绩公布时间
根据疫情防控形势和上级主管部门统一安排, 2020年初试成绩预计在2月20日之后公布,请各位考生耐心等待并做好复试准备。
初试成绩的核分申请、复试时间及形式要求,将在工作具体安排确定后,第一时间公告。
二、调整博士研究生初试时间
根据上级主管部门要求和疫情防控形势,学校决定将博士研究生初试时间从3月14日-15日延期至5月16日-17日举行,请各位考生相互转告。博士研究生复试时间、要求等安排另行通知。
以上事项请各位考生密切关注杭州电子科技大学研究生院官网和官微相关公告。在此期间,请各位考生按照我校招生简章和招生目录的相关要求安心在家复习,切勿提前来杭访校、访师,同时按照科学的方法做好个人防护工作,保持良好的精神状态及健康的体质迎接即将到来的考试。
三、报考要求
1.国家承认学历的应届本科毕业生;
2.具有国家承认的大学本科毕业学历的人员;
3.获得国家承认的大专毕业学历后经两年或两年以上(从大专毕业到录取为硕士生当年9月1日),达到与大学本科毕业生同等学力,且符合招生单位根据本单位的培养目标对考生提出的具体业务要求的人员;国家承认学历的本科结业生和成人高校应届本科毕业生,按本科毕业同等学力身份报考;
4.已获硕士学位或博士学位的人员,可以再次报考硕士生,但只能报考委托培养或自筹经费的硕士生;
5.报考的年龄一般不超过40周岁,报考委托培养和自筹经费的考生年龄不限。
6.《2009年招收攻读硕士学位研究生管理规定》考生报名时应签署《考生诚信考试承诺书》,并规定建立全国统一考试考生诚信档案,作弊者下一年度不允许报考。
7.身体健康状况符合国家和招生单位规定的体检要求。
希望本篇文章能够帮助到你们,如果还遇到其他不能解决的问题,要及时反馈给51题库考试学习网,我们会尽快帮您解决。
下面小编为大家准备了 研究生入学 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
肾病综合征患者最易栓塞的血管是
A.下肢深静脉 B. 下腔静脉 C.肾静脉 D.脑血管
答案:C
解析:
肾病综合征患者由于有效血容量减少、血液浓缩、高脂血症等病因造成血液黏稠度增加,易发生 血栓、栓塞并发症,其中以肾静脉血栓形成最常见,发生率约10% ~50%。此外,肺血管、下肢静脉、下腔静脉、冠状血管和脑血管也可发生。
分布于下肢外侧前缘的经脉是
A.足阳明胃经
B.足少阳胆经
C.足太阳膀胱经
D.足少阴肾经
答案:A
解析:
在四肢部,阴经分布在内侧面,阳经分布在外侧面。内侧分三阴,外侧分三阳。①太阴、阳明在前缘。②少阴、太阳在后缘。③厥阴、少阳在中线。按此可知道为足阳明胃经。十二经脉交接歌诀记忆:肺大胃比心小,光剩包三单干——肺、大肠、胃经、脾经、心经、小肠经、膀胱经、肾经、心包经、三焦经、胆经、肝经。
《内经》所谓“阴阳之道路”,是指( ) ,
A.天地
B.男女
C.左右
D.水火
答案:C
解析:
出自《素问。阴阳应象大论,:“天地者,万物之上下也;阴阳者,血气之男女也;左右者,阴阳之道路也;水火者,阴阳之征兆也;阴阳者,万物之能始也”。
Text 1 Come on–Everybody’s doing it.That whispered message,half invitation and half forcing,is what most of us think of when we hear the words peer pressure.It usually leads to no good-drinking,drugs and casual sex.But in her new book Join the Club,Tina Rosenberg contends that peer pressure can also be a positive force through what she calls the social cure,in which organizations and officials use the power of group dynamics to help individuals improve their lives and possibly the word.Rosenberg,the recipient of a Pulitzer Prize,offers a host of example of the social cure in action:In South Carolina,a state-sponsored antismoking program called Rage Against the Haze sets out to make cigarettes uncool.In South Africa,an HIV-prevention initiative known as LoveLife recruits young people to promote safe sex among their peers.The idea seems promising,and Rosenberg is a perceptive observer.Her critique of the lameness of many pubic-health campaigns is spot-on:they fail to mobilize peer pressure for healthy habits,and they demonstrate a seriously flawed understanding of psychology.”Dare to be different,please don’t smoke!”pleads one billboard campaign aimed at reducing smoking among teenagers-teenagers,who desire nothing more than fitting in.Rosenberg argues convincingly that public-health advocates ought to take a page from advertisers,so skilled at applying peer pressure.But on the general effectiveness of the social cure,Rosenberg is less persuasive.Join the Club is filled with too much irrelevant detail and not enough exploration of the social and biological factors that make peer pressure so powerful.The most glaring flaw of the social cure as it’s presented here is that it doesn’t work very well for very long.Rage Against the Haze failed once state funding was cut.Evidence that the LoveLife program produces lasting changes is limited and mixed.There’s no doubt that our peer groups exert enormous influence on our behavior.An emerging body of research shows that positive health habits-as well as negative ones-spread through networks of friends via social communication.This is a subtle form of peer pressure:we unconsciously imitate the behavior we see every day.Far less certain,however,is how successfully experts and bureaucrats can select our peer groups and steer their activities in virtuous directions.It’s like the teacher who breaks up the troublemakers in the back row by pairing them with better-behaved classmates.The tactic never really works.And that’s the problem with a social cure engineered from the outside:in the real world,as in school,we insist on choosing our own friends.23.In the author’s view,Rosenberg’s book fails to
A.adequately probe social and biological factors
B.effectively evade the flaws of the social cure
C.illustrate the functions of state funding
D.produce a long-lasting social effect
答案:A
解析:
根据题干“作者认为,罗森博格的书未能……”,所选答案是要指出作者认为这本书的缺点是什么。文章第四段第二句“Join the Club is filled with too much irrelevant detail and not enough exploration of the social and biological factors that make peer pressure so powerful.”,意思是:“《加入俱乐部》一书写了太多无关细节,没有认真探究社会和生物因素,这些因素能使同
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。