哪些人可以申请OBU学位?请看过来吧!

发布时间:2019-12-28


对于毫无工作经验的大学生来讲,报考ACCA就等于在毕业时拥有了一定的财务实操。

不过,还有一个优势则是,通过报考ACCA证书我们还可以申请牛津布鲁克斯大学OBU海外学位。那么,哪些人可以申请OBU学位呢?

1、通过前九门考试。

2、完成职业道德与专业技能模块学位资格申请资格评估。

提交论文两个月之前通过ACCA基础九门课程,并完成道德模块测试的ACCA学员无需英语证明,但之前因为英语证明而丧失了OBU申请资格的ACCA学员、准会员、会员可重新获得资格提交论文申请学位。

2009年11月之后注册,由于未选择OBU项目而错失了OBU申请资格的ACCA学员、准会员、会员可重新获得资格提交论文申请学位。

学位评级: 论文通过共有AB,或C三个分数,论文的分数和该学员ACCA前九门平均成绩综合起来可确定该生学位的级别。

牛津布鲁克斯大学会计本科学位共有:First class Upper second class Lower second class Third class4个级别。决定这个RR是否通过的方面有:语言,沟通,分析是否深入,IT技术使用,参考资料使用及格式等方面。

那么,如何申请OBU学位呢?我们一起来看一看吧!

符合以上条件之一者,通过一篇论文包括7500字的Research Report2000字的Skills and Learning Statement(SLS)即可。在这个过程当中,OBU要求每个学员有对应的注册论文导师,注册论文导师需要与学员有至少3次讨论,每次30分钟。学员需要在最后一次讨论中对导师进行15分钟的演讲,演讲的PPT页数限制在20页,而这份PPT是需要与RRSLS一并上交给OBU的,OBU还会与导师确认学员是否真的进行了演讲。所以,上交的内容有RRSLS以及PPT。其中RR是基于OBU提供的20个主题中,选择其中的一个进行研究报告的写作。对于某些主题,比如Topic8Topic15要特别小心是行业的要求的,也就是说不能随随便便写任意一个行业企业的分析,应该限制在OBU要求的行业中进行选择。

申请OBU学位时,应注意以下几点:

1、在上交论文至少两个月前通过前九门科目的考试,要注意其中FRAAFM三个科目不可免考。

2、完成ACCA的道德模块。

3、完成论文。

4、及时支付ACCA年费,欠费状态下无法申请。

5、特别注意,OBU学位不再需要提供英语等级证明。

好了,以上就是关于哪些人可以申请OBU学位的相关内容的介绍,如果想了解更多,可以在51题库考试学习网留言咨询的哦!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(c) (i) Identify and describe FOUR quality control procedures that are applicable to the individual audit

engagement; and (8 marks)

正确答案:
(c) (i) ISQC 1 Quality Control for Firms That Perform. Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information and Other
Assurance and Related Services Engagements provides guidance on the overall quality control systems that should be
implemented by an audit firm. ISA 220 Quality Control for Audits of Historical Financial Information specifies the quality
control procedures that should be applied by the engagement team in individual audit assignments.
Procedures include the following:
Client acceptance procedures
There should be full documentation, and conclusion on, ethical and client acceptance issues in each audit assignment.
The engagement partner should consider whether members of the audit team have complied with ethical requirements,
for example, whether all members of the team are independent of the client. Additionally, the engagement partner should
conclude whether all acceptance procedures have been followed, for example, that the audit firm has considered the
integrity of the principal owners and key management of the client. Other procedures on client acceptance should
include:
– Obtaining professional clearance from previous auditors
– Consideration of any conflict of interest
– Money laundering (client identification) procedures.
Engagement team
Procedures should be followed to ensure that the engagement team collectively has the skills, competence and time to
perform. the audit engagement. The engagement partner should assess that the audit team, for example:
– Has the appropriate level of technical knowledge
– Has experience of audit engagements of a similar nature and complexity
– Has the ability to apply professional judgement
– Understands professional standards, and regulatory and legal requirements.
Direction
The engagement team should be directed by the engagement partner. Procedures such as an engagement planning
meeting should be undertaken to ensure that the team understands:
– Their responsibilities
– The objectives of the work they are to perform
– The nature of the client’s business
– Risk related issues
– How to deal with any problems that may arise; and
– The detailed approach to the performance of the audit.
The planning meeting should be led by the partner and should include all people involved with the audit. There should
be a discussion of the key issues identified at the planning stage.
Supervision
Supervision should be continuous during the engagement. Any problems that arise during the audit should be rectified
as soon as possible. Attention should be focused on ensuring that members of the audit team are carrying out their work
in accordance with the planned approach to the engagement. Significant matters should be brought to the attention of
senior members of the audit team. Documentation should be made of key decisions made during the audit engagement.
Review
The review process is one of the key quality control procedures. All work performed must be reviewed by a more senior
member of the audit team. Reviewers should consider for example whether:
– Work has been performed in accordance with professional standards
– The objectives of the procedures performed have been achieved
– Work supports conclusions drawn and is appropriately documented.
The review process itself must be evidenced.
Consultation
Finally the engagement partner should arrange consultation on difficult or contentious matters. This is a procedure
whereby the matter is discussed with a professional outside the engagement team, and sometimes outside the audit
firm. Consultations must be documented to show:
– The issue on which the consultation was sought; and
– The results of the consultation.

(c) (i) Explain how Messier Ltd can assist Galileo with the cost of relocating to the UK and/or provide him with

interest-free loan finance for this purpose without increasing his UK income tax liability; (3 marks)

正确答案:
(c) (i) Relocation costs
Direct assistance
Messier Ltd can bear the cost of certain qualifying relocation costs of Galileo up to a maximum of £8,000 without
increasing his UK income tax liability. Qualifying costs include the legal, professional and other fees in relation to the
purchase of a house, the costs of travelling to the UK and the cost of transporting his belongings. The costs must be
incurred before the end of the tax year following the year of the relocation, i.e. by 5 April 2010.
Assistance in the form. of a loan
Messier Ltd can provide Galileo with an interest-free loan of up to £5,000 without giving rise to any UK income tax.

(b) a discussion (with suitable calculations) as to how the directors’ share options would be accounted for in the

financial statements for the year ended 31 May 2005 including the adjustment to opening balances;

(9 marks)

正确答案:

(b) Accounting in the financial statements for the year ended 31 May 2005
IFRS2 requires an expense to be recognised for the share options granted to the directors with a corresponding amount shown
in equity. Where options do not vest immediately but only after a period of service, then there is a presumption that the
services will be rendered over the ‘vesting period’. The fair value of the services rendered will be measured by reference to
the fair value of the equity instruments at the date that the equity instruments were granted. Fair value should be based on
market prices. The treatment of vesting conditions depends on whether or not the conditions relate to the market price of the
instruments. Market conditions are effectively taken into account in determining the fair value of the instruments and therefore
can be ignored for the purposes of estimating the number of equity instruments that will vest. For other conditions such as
remaining in the employment of the company, the calculations are carried out based on the best estimate of the number of
instruments that will vest. The estimate is revised when subsequent information is available.
The share options granted to J. Van Heflin on 1 June 2002 were before the date set in IFRS2 for accounting for such options
(7 November 2002). Therefore, no expense calculation is required. (Note: candidates calculating the expense for the latter
share options would be given credit if they stated that the company could apply IFRS2 to other options in certaincircumstances.) The remaining options are valued as follows:


声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。