注册ACCA时需要哪些材料
发布时间:2022-04-12
最近部分同学在询问ACCA考试相关的问题,为了帮助大家了解更多,51题库考试学习网为大家带来了ACCA考试相关的信息,一起来看看吧!
步骤一:准备注册所需材料
1、在全球官方网站进行注册:
(1)在线上传注册资料扫描文件
(2)采用纸质材料将注册资料递交ACCA代表处
步骤二:在全球官方网站进行注册
(1)在线注册地址http://www.accaglobal.com/en/qualifications/apply-now.html
(2)填写相关个人信息(如姓名、性别、出生日期等)
(3)填写相关个人学历信息(如毕业院校、学历、专业等)
(4)在线上传注册资料
(5)若学员计划申请免试,在填写完毕Your Qualifications之后,系统便会自动显示学员有可能获得的免试科目,最终免试结果以注册成功后ACCA英国总部的审核结果为准;如需放弃免试,需点击相应科目Give Up选项
(6)若学员放弃牛津布鲁克斯大学的学位申请资格,需在Bsc Degree处勾选是否放弃
在校学生所需准备的注册材料:
中英文在校证明(原件必须为彩色扫描件)
中英文成绩单(均需为加盖所在学校或学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)
中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖所在学校或学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)
2寸彩色护照用证件照一张
用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票(推荐使用Visa)
非在校学生所需准备的注册资料(符合学历要求):
中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章的彩色扫描件)
中英文学历证明(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章的彩色扫描件*MPAcc专业,需提供中英文成绩单*国外学历均需提供成绩单)
2寸彩色护照用证件照一张
用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票(推荐使用Visa)
非在校学生所需准备的注册资料(符合学历要求):
中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章的彩色扫描件)
中英文学历证明(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章的彩色扫描件*MPAcc专业,需提供中英文成绩单*国外学历均需提供成绩单)
2寸彩色护照用证件照一张
用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票(推荐使用Visa)
非在校学生所需准备的注册资料(不符合学历要求-FIA形式):
中英文个人身份证件或护照(原件必须为彩色扫描件、英文件必须为加盖翻译公司翻译专用章或者学校教务部门公章的彩色扫描件)
2寸彩色护照用证件照一张
用于支付注册费用的国际双币信用卡或国际汇票(推荐使用Visa)
步骤三:支付注册费用
(1)可使用VISA或MasterCard信用卡(见信用卡面logo)
(2)可使用双币信用卡
(3)双币信用卡可为人民币+美金,也可为人民币+英镑,美金版信用卡会将ACCA扣除的英镑自动转换为美金
(4)卡面上无VISA或MasterCard的信用卡(如JCB、AmericanExpress等)皆不可用
(5)可使用支付宝
(6)可使用银联借记卡
步骤四:查询注册进度
(1)提交注册后会通过电子邮件收到一份账号、密码的确认邮件,随后学生即可通过My ACCA Account查询注册进度
(2)线上完成全部注册的时间约4周。
以上就是51题库考试学习网给大家带来的ACCA考试相关资讯,想要了解更多ACCA考试相关的信息,请大家持续关注51题库考试学习网!
下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。
(b) Peter, one of Linden Limited’s non-executive directors, having lived and worked in the UK for most of his adult
life, sold his home near London on 22 March 2006 and, together with his wife (a French citizen), moved to live
in a villa which she owns in the south of France. Peter is now demanding that the tax deducted from his director’s
fees, for the board meetings held on 18 April and 16 May 2006, be refunded, on the grounds that, as he is no
longer resident in the UK, he is no longer liable to UK income tax. All of the company’s board meetings are held
at its offices in Cambridge.
Despite Peter’s assurance that none of the other companies of which he is a director has disputed his change of
tax status, Damian is uncertain whether he should make the refunds requested. However, as Peter is a friend of
the company’s founder, Linden Limited’s managing director is urging him to do so, stating that if the tax does
have to be paid, then Linden Limited could always bear the cost.
Required:
Advise Damian whether Peter is correct in his assertion regarding his tax position and in the case that there
is a UK tax liability the implications of the managing director’s suggestion. You are not required to consider
national insurance (NIC) issues. (4 marks)
(b) Peter will have been resident and ordinarily resident in the UK. When such individuals leave the UK for a purpose other than
to take up full time employment abroad, they normally continue to still be so regarded unless their absence spans a complete
tax year. But, where someone intends to live permanently abroad or to do so for a period of at least three tax years, they may
be treated as non-resident and non-ordinarily resident from the day after the date of their departure, if they can provide
evidence to HMRC of that intention. Selling a residence in the UK and setting up home abroad will normally constitute such
evidence. However to retain non-resident status the intention must actually be fulfilled, and visits to the UK must not exceed
182 days in any tax year or average more than 90 days per year over a period of four tax years. Given that Peter would appear
to have several company directorships in the UK, it is possible that he might fail to satisfy the 90 day average ‘substantial
visits’ rule.
Even if Peter is classed as non-resident, any remuneration earned in the UK will still be liable to UK income tax, and subject
to PAYE, unless it is for duties incidental to an overseas employment, which is unlikely to be the case for fees paid to a nonexecutive
director for attending board meetings. Thus, income tax should still be deducted from the fees under PAYE. Where
PAYE should have been deducted from a director’s emoluments and it has not been, but the tax is nevertheless accounted
for by the company to HMRC, then to the extent that the tax is not reimbursed by the director, he will be treated as receiving
a benefit equivalent to the amount of tax.
(ii) the panel interview with more than one interviewer. (5 marks)
(ii) Panel interviews are often used for senior appointments and consist of two or more interviewers.
The advantages of such interviews are that they allow opinion and views to be shared amongst the panel. They provide a more complete and coherent approach, hence problems of bias inherent in face to face interviews can be reduced.
They may also be appropriate where an individual with specialist or technical skills has to support the interviewer in relation to assessing the technical competencies of the interviewee.The disadvantages are that panel interviews can be difficult to control, interviewers may deviate or ask irrelevant questions and they can be easily dominated by a strong personality who is able unduly to influence others. In addition,
such interviews can often result in disagreement amongst the panel members.
(d) The management of Wonderland plc have become concerned about the increased level of operating costs
associated with its petrol-driven ferries and have made a strategic decision to dispose of these. They are now
considering entering into a contract with the Newman Steamship Company (NSC), a shipping organisation based
in Robynland. The contract would entail NSC providing transport to and from Cinola Island for all visitors to the
zoo and circus.
As a result of negotiations with NSC, the directors of Wonderland plc are considering two options whereby NSC
will become responsible for the transportation of visitors to and from Cinola Island with effect from 1 December
2007 or 1 December 2008.
Additional information is available as follows:
(1) NSC would require Wonderland plc to pay for the necessary modifications to their steamships in order that
they would satisfy marine regulations with regard to passenger transportation. The only firm which could
undertake this work is currently working to full capacity and would require a payment of £2,450,000 in
order to undertake the work necessary so that the ferries could be in operation by 1 December 2007. The
same firm would require a payment of £1,725,000 in order to make the necessary modifications so that
the ferries could be in operation by 1 December 2008. The government of Robynland would be willing to
pay a grant of 8% towards the cost of getting the ferries into operation by 1 December 2007, but would not
be willing to pay a grant in respect of any later date.
(2) On 1 December 2002 Wonderland plc paid £500,000 to the Port Licencing Authority of Robynland. This
payment was for a licence which entitles Wonderland plc to use all harbour facilities in Robynland during
the five-year period ending 30 November 2007. The licence could be renewed on 1 December 2007 at a
cost of £150,000 per annum.
(3) Redundancy payments would need to be paid in respect of loss of employment. These would amount to
£1,200,000 if the contract with NSC commenced on 1 December 2007. This amount would reduce to
£750,000 if the contract commenced on 1 December 2008.
(4) Wonderland plc has a contract for the provision of petrol for its ferries which is due to expire on 30 November
2008. Early termination of the contract would incur a penalty charge of £76,000. An emergency reserve
stock of petrol held by Wonderland plc, which cannot be used after 30 November 2007 due to marine
regulations regarding the age of fuel, could be sold for £55,000 on 1 December 2007 but not on any date
thereafter.
(5) The ferries could be sold for £3,300,000 on 1 December 2007. If retained after 1 December 2007 the
ferries would require servicing during the year ending 30 November 2008 which would incur costs
amounting to £150,000. The resale value of the ferries on 1 December 2008 would be £2,900,000.
(6) Stock of consumable items which originally cost £150,000 could be sold on 1 December 2007 for
£110,000 and on 1 December 2008 for £50,000.
Required:
(i) On purely financial grounds, advise whether the management of Wonderland plc should enter into a
contract with NSC with effect from 1 December 2007 or 1 December 2008. You may ignore the time
value of money. (9 marks)
声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-28
- 2020-04-23
- 2020-04-20
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-02-20
- 2020-01-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-10-14
- 2021-10-18
- 2020-03-27
- 2020-03-25
- 2022-02-05
- 2020-05-05
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-21
- 2020-01-10
- 2021-10-26
- 2021-07-28
- 2020-01-30
- 2020-05-11
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-04-29
- 2022-02-05
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-05-09
- 2020-01-10
- 2020-05-07