你知道ACCA考试上海考点信息吗?来看看吧!

发布时间:2020-03-27


你知道ACCA考试上海考点信息吗?想要了解的小伙伴快跟随51题库考试学习网的脚步一起来看看吧!

ACCA官方在中国国内设定了很多ACCA考试地点以方便学员灵活地进行选择和报考。

以下为ACCA上海市内的考点地址供大家参考,也可登录ACCA英国官方网站查询:

I987上海东北上海开放大学,国顺路288I997上海西南好望角大饭店,肇嘉浜路500号,青松城大酒店,肇嘉浜路777号,I844上海浦东,上海海事大学,东明路1336号,I849松江上海市松江区文翔路,1900号上海对外贸易学院松江校区。

51题库考试学习网还给大家带来了ACCA免考政策:

部分财务相关专业大学在校或毕业学生,参加ACCA考试注册时,将获得一定科目的免试权。ACCA对于参加专业会计师考试(ACCA)的中国学员的免试政策详情为:

1、教育部认可高校毕业生(金融、财务管理、审计专业也享受等同于会计学专业的免试政策):      

会计学专业-获得学士学位或硕士学位:免试5门课程(AB-PM)。

会计学–辅修专业:免试3门课程(AB-FA)。

法律专业:免试1门课程 (LW)。

商务及管理专业:免试1门课程(AB)。

MPAcc专业(获得MPAcc学位或完成MPAcc大纲规定的所有课程、只有论文待完成):免试5门课程(AB-PM)。注:部分院校的MPAcc专业已专门申请ACCA总部的免试审核,因此有多于5门的免试。

MBA学位获得MBA学位:免试3门课程(AB-FA)。

2、教育部认可高校在校生(本科):      

会计学专业-完成第一学年课程:可以注册为ACCA正式学员,无免试。

会计学专业-完成第二学年课程:免试3门课程(AB-FA)。

其他专业 - 在校生:登录ACCA全球网站(www.accaglobal.com)查询。

3、中国注册会计师资格: 

CICPA - 2009年“6+1”制度前获得全科合格证或者会员资格证:免试5门课程(AB-LWTX)。

CICPA - 2009年“6+1”制度后获得全科合格证或者会员资格证:免试9门课程(AB-FM)。

以上专业所对应的免试门数仅供参考,最终免试结果由ACCA英国总部审核确认。

好了,又到了要和大家说再见的时刻了,想了解更多ACCA考试相关信息请关注51题库考试学习网哦!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

(b) Identify and explain the financial statement risks to be taken into account in planning the final audit.

(12 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Financial statement risks
Tutorial note: Note the timeframe. Financial statements for the year to 30 June 2006 are draft. Certain misstatements
may therefore exist due to year-end procedures not yet having taken place.
Revenue/(Receivables)
■ Revenue has increased by 11·8% ((161·5 – 144·4)/144·4 × 100). Overstatement could arise if rebates due to customers
have not yet been accounted for in full (as they are calculated in arrears). If rebates have still to be accounted for trade
receivables will be similarly overstated.
Materials expense
■ Materials expense has increased by 17·8% ((88.0 – 74·7)/74·7 × 100). This is more than the increase in revenue. This
could be legitimate (e.g. if fuel costs have increased significantly). However, the increase could indicate misclassification
of:
– revenue expenditure (see fall in other expenses below);
– capital expenditure (e.g. on overhauls or major refurbishment) as revenue;
– finance lease payments as operating lease.
Depreciation/amortisation
■ This has fallen by 10·5% ((8·5 – 9·5)/9·5 × 100). This could be valid (e.g. if Yates has significant assets already fully
depreciated or the asset base is lower since last year’s restructuring). However, there is a risk of understatement if, for
example:
– not all assets have been depreciated (or depreciated at the wrong rates, or only for 11 months of the year);
– cost of non-current assets is understated (e.g. due to failure to recognise capital expenditure)1;
– impairment losses have not been recognised (as compared with the prior year).
Tutorial note: Depreciation on vehicles and transport equipment represents only 7% of cost. If all items were being
depreciated on a straight-line basis over eight years this should be 12·5%. The depreciation on other equipment looks more
reasonable as it amounts to 14% which would be consistent with an average age of vehicles of seven years (i.e. in the middle
of the range 3 – 13 years).
Other expenses
■ These have fallen by 15·5% ((19·6 – 23·2)/23·2 × 100). They may have fallen (e.g. following the restructuring) or may be
understated due to:
– expenses being misclassified as materials expense;
– underestimation of accrued expenses (especially as the financial reporting period has not yet expired).
Intangibles
■ Intangible assets have increased by $1m (16% on the prior year). Although this may only just be material to the
financial statements as a whole (see (a)) this is the net movement, therefore additions could be material.
■ Internally-generated intangibles will be overstated if:
– any of the IAS 38 recognition criteria cannot be demonstrated;
– any impairment in the year has not yet been written off in accordance with IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’.
Tangible assets
■ The net book value of property (at cost) has fallen by 5%, vehicles are virtually unchanged (increased by just 2·5%)
and other equipment (though the least material category) has fallen by 20·4%.
■ Vehicles and equipment may be overstated if:
– disposals have not been recorded;
– depreciation has been undercharged (e.g. not for a whole year);
– impairments have not yet been accounted for.
■ Understatement will arise if finance leases are treated as operating leases.
Receivables
■ Trade receivables have increased by just 2·2% (although sales increased by 11·8%) and may be understated due to a
cutoff error resulting in overstatement of cash receipts.
■ There is a risk of overstatement if sufficient allowances have not been made for the impairment of individually significant
balances and for the remainder assessed on a portfolio or group basis.
Restructuring provision
■ The restructuring provision that was made last year has fallen/been utilised by 10·2%. There is a risk of overstatement
if the provision is underutilised/not needed for the purpose for which it was established.
Finance lease liabilities
■ Although finance lease liabilities have increased (by $1m) there is a greater risk of understatement than overstatement
if leased assets are not recognised on the balance sheet (i.e. capitalised).
■ Disclosure risk arises if the requirements of IAS 17 ‘Leases’ (e.g. in respect of minimum lease payments) are not met.
Trade payables
■ These have increased by only 5·3% compared with the 17·8% increase in materials expense. There is a risk of
understatement as notifications (e.g. suppliers’ invoices) of liabilities outstanding at 30 June 2006 may have still to be
received (the month of June being an unexpired period).
Other (employee) liabilities
■ These may be understated as they have increased by only 7·5% although staff costs have increased by 14%. For
example, balances owing in respect of outstanding holiday entitlements at the year end may not yet be accurately
estimated.
Tutorial note: Credit will be given to other financial statements risks specific to the scenario. For example, ‘time-sensitive
delivery schedules’ might give rise to penalties or claims, that could result in understated provisions or undisclosed
contingent liabilities. Also, given that this is a new audit and the result has changed significantly (from loss to profit) might
suggest a risk of misstatement in the opening balances (and hence comparative information).
1 Tutorial note: This may be unlikely as other expenses have fallen also.

(b) Analyse THREE potential problems, based solely on the information provided above, that TMC might

encounter in the acquisition of CBC. (5 marks)

正确答案:
(b) Three potential problems that TMC might encounter in the proposed acquisition of CBC are as follows:
(i) TMC is forecast to have a 22% share of the market for disposable nappies at the end of 2008. If TMC was to acquire
CBC at that time it would then have a market share of ($681m + $155m)/$3,095m = 27%. Much will depend on
prevailing legislation. For example, in the UK it might be the case that the Director General of Fair Trading may ask the
Competition Commission (CC) to investigate if any organisation controls 25% or more of the market. The Secretary of
State may do likewise in circumstances where the proposed takeover would lead to the creation of a firm that would
control 25% or more of the market. (Similar examples from other countries would be equally acceptable.)
(ii) The directors of TMC need to be aware of the precise nature of the cultural problems that CBC has experienced during
recent years as this could be very damaging to its business if the acquisition of CBC goes ahead. In an extreme case
the organisational cultures of TMC and CBC might be incompatible. The directors of TMC need to make a very careful
assessment as to whether it would be possible to transform. a negative culture into a positive one. If they consider that
this would prove to be very difficult then they might be best advised not to proceed with the acquisition.
(iii) The directors of TMC have no experience of managing such acquisitions and this might mean that the integration of CBC
into TMC would prove problematic. It is probable that the systems are different as well as the management styles,
employee skills and business infrastructure.
(Alternative relevant discussion would be acceptable)

(c) Briefly discuss why the directors of HFL might choose contract D irrespective of whether or not contract D

would have been selected using expected values as per part (a). (2 marks)

正确答案:
(c) The directors might select Contract D under which 360,000 kilograms of organic mushrooms would be supplied to HFL for
each outlet. This is the entire capacity of HFL which would ensure that competitors would not be able to supply the same
product and hence the competitive advantage held by HFL might be preserved.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。