ACCA课程必须都要考过吗?它的课程设置有哪些?

发布时间:2020-01-29


最近,有很多小伙伴问,ACCA课程那么多,是否必须都考过?它的课程设置有哪些?关于这些问题,今天,51题库考试学习网来给大家介绍一下。

很多人都知道ACCA是国际注册会计师资格,它的课程体系涵盖了财会、金融的各个方面。很多人担心自己并不能考下来,其实ACCA的课程设置是很有规律的。

 ACCA课程一共15门,只需要通过13门就能获得证书。其主要分四个阶段,第一部分为比较基础的应用阶段,主要分为知识课程和技能课程两个部分。

知识课程主要涉及财务会计和管理会计方面的核心知识,也为接下去进行技能阶段的详细学习搭建了一个平台。知识课程主要有ABMAFA,三个科目同时也是FIA方式注册学员所学习的FABFMAFFA三个科目。

技能课程共有六门课程,广泛的涵盖了一名会计师所涉及的知识领域及必须掌握的技能。其中包含了:LWPMTXFRAAFM五门课。

第二部分为专业阶段,主要分为核心课程和选修课程。该阶段的课程相当于硕士阶段的课程 难度,是对第一部分课程的引申和发展。该阶段课程引入了作为未来的高级会计师所必须的更高级的职业技能和知识技能。

选修课程为从事高级管理咨询或顾问职业 的学员,设计了解决更高级和更复杂的问题的技能。主要涵盖的科目有:SBRSBLAFMAPMAAAATX,其中AFMAPMAAAATX为四选二的选修课。

下面来看一下这15门课程分别都包括哪些知识。

P阶段的课程主要分为核心课程和选修(四选二)课程。该阶段的课程相当于硕士阶段的课程难度,是对第一部分课程的引申和发展。该阶段课程引入了作为未来的高级会计师所必须的更高级的职业技能和知识技能。选修课程为从事高级管理咨询或顾问职业的学员,设计了解决更高级和更复杂的问题的技能。

ACCA考试的P阶段着重于企业战略管理中财务人员的作用,培养学员以专业知识对信息进行评估,并在专业伦理框架内提出合理的经营建议和忠告。选择性课程的引入,使学员能根据自身的工作性质选择课程,从而强化相关领域的知识。

核心课程具体如下:

战略商业领袖Strategic Business Leader SBR;战略商业报告Strategic Business Reporting

选修课程:AFM高级财务管理Advanced Financial Management APM高级业绩管理Advanced Performance Management ATX高级税务Advanced TaxationAAA高级审计与认证业务Advanced Audit and Assurance .

具体课程中有2门核心课程是必须考试的,另外选修模块中选考两门,P阶段考试科目是专业的阶段课程,相对于前面二部分是有难度的,对综合应用英语的能力和专专业知识部分提出了新的挑战。

好了,以上就是关于2020ACCA考试课程设置的内容介绍,希望对大家有帮助。如果还想了解更多信息,可以关注51题库考试学习网的哦!


下面小编为大家准备了 ACCA考试 的相关考题,供大家学习参考。

22 Which of the following items may appear in a company’s statement of changes in equity, according to IAS 1 Presentation of financial statements?

1 Unrealised revaluation gains.

2 Dividends paid.

3 Proceeds of equity share issue.

4 Profit for the period.

A 2, 3 and 4 only

B 1, 3 and 4 only

C All four items

D 1, 2 and 4 only

正确答案:C

19 What is the company’s return on shareholders’ equity?

A 15/40 = 37·5%

B 20/100 = 20%

C 15/100 = 15%

D 20/150 = 13·3%

正确答案:C

3 (a) Financial statements often contain material balances recognised at fair value. For auditors, this leads to additional

audit risk.

Required:

Discuss this statement. (7 marks)

正确答案:
3 Poppy Co
(a) Balances held at fair value are frequently recognised as material items in the statement of financial position. Sometimes it is
required by the financial reporting framework that the measurement of an asset or liability is at fair value, e.g. certain
categories of financial instruments, whereas it is sometimes the entity’s choice to measure an item using a fair value model
rather than a cost model, e.g. properties. It is certainly the case that many of these balances will be material, meaning that
the auditor must obtain sufficient appropriate evidence that the fair value measurement is in accordance with the
requirements of financial reporting standards. ISA 540 (Revised and Redrafted) Auditing Accounting Estimates Including Fair
Value Accounting Estimates and Related Disclosures and ISA 545 Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
contain guidance in this area.
As part of the understanding of the entity and its environment, the auditor should gain an insight into balances that are stated
at fair value, and then assess the impact of this on the audit strategy. This will include an evaluation of the risk associated
with the balance(s) recognised at fair value.
Audit risk comprises three elements; each is discussed below in the context of whether material balances shown at fair value
will lead to increased risk for the auditor.
Inherent risk
Many measurements based on estimates, including fair value measurements, are inherently imprecise and subjective in
nature. The fair value assessment is likely to involve significant judgments, e.g. regarding market conditions, the timing of
cash flows, or the future intentions of the entity. In addition, there may be a deliberate attempt by management to manipulate
the fair value to achieve a desired aim within the financial statements, in other words to attempt some kind of window
dressing.
Many fair value estimation models are complicated, e.g. discounted cash flow techniques, or the actuarial calculations used
to determine the value of a pension fund. Any complicated calculations are relatively high risk, as difficult valuation techniques
are simply more likely to contain errors than simple valuation techniques. However, there will be some items shown at fair
value which have a low inherent risk, because the measurement of fair value may be relatively straightforward, e.g. assets
that are regularly bought and sold on open markets that provide readily available and reliable information on the market prices
at which actual exchanges occur.
In addition to the complexities discussed above, some fair value measurement techniques will contain significant
assumptions, e.g. the most appropriate discount factor to use, or judgments over the future use of an asset. Management
may not always have sufficient experience and knowledge in making these judgments.
Thus the auditor should approach some balances recognised at fair value as having a relatively high inherent risk, as their
subjective and complex nature means that the balance is prone to contain an error. However, the auditor should not just
assume that all fair value items contain high inherent risk – each balance recognised at fair value should be assessed for its
individual level of risk.
Control risk
The risk that the entity’s internal monitoring system fails to prevent and detect valuation errors needs to be assessed as part
of overall audit risk assessment. One problem is that the fair value assessment is likely to be performed once a year, outside
the normal accounting and management systems, especially where the valuation is performed by an external specialist.
Therefore, as a non-routine event, the assessment of fair value is likely not to have the same level of monitoring or controls
as a day-to-day business transaction.
However, due to the material impact of fair values on the statement of financial position, and in some circumstances on profit,
management may have made great effort to ensure that the assessment is highly monitored and controlled. It therefore could
be the case that there is extremely low control risk associated with the recognition of fair values.
Detection risk
The auditor should minimise detection risk via thorough planning and execution of audit procedures. The audit team may
lack experience in dealing with the fair value in question, and so would be unlikely to detect errors in the valuation techniques
used. Over-reliance on an external specialist could also lead to errors not being found.
Conclusion
It is true that the increasing recognition of items measured at fair value will in many cases cause the auditor to assess the
audit risk associated with the balance as high. However, it should not be assumed that every fair value item will be likely to
contain a material misstatement. The auditor must be careful to identify and respond to the level of risk for fair value items
on an individual basis to ensure that sufficient and appropriate evidence is gathered, thus reducing the audit risk to an
acceptable level.

(ii) job enlargement; (5 marks)

正确答案:
(ii) Job enlargement is often referred to as ‘horizontal job enlargement’ and is aimed at widening the content of jobs by increasing the number of operations in which the job holder is involved and is another method by which employees at Bailey’s might become more involved. It reduces the level of repetition and dullness by providing a horizontal extension to activity, reducing monotony and boredom inherent in the operations at Bailey’s.

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:contact@51tk.com 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。